Wednesday, May 31, 2006
Semi-Obvious Solution to Bidirectionality Problem
Can't you just limit bidirectionality within the resolution by specifying the direction the Aff must rule? For example....
The USSC should overrule one of the following:
Casey v. Planned Parenthood, in order to increase access to abortion
Gratz v. Bollinger, in order to increase the availability of affirmative action
Morrison, in order to permit a federal civil remedy for gendered violence
etc.
etc.
The USSC should overrule one of the following:
Casey v. Planned Parenthood, in order to increase access to abortion
Gratz v. Bollinger, in order to increase the availability of affirmative action
Morrison, in order to permit a federal civil remedy for gendered violence
etc.
etc.
posted by Lindsay at 5/31/2006 05:08:00 PM
¶ 
Comments:
<< Home
Hey Ede, I think if you want to do a list of cases, you probably don't need the direction qualifiers. I would favor a topic that specified a list of areas and included direction qualifiers. I actually think that would result in more predictable neg ground than a list of cases with no direction qualifiers....
Post a Comment
<< Home
