Friday, June 02, 2006
Does anyone think it may be useful to create a list where we know there is a strong defense of the need to overrule? Perhaps a topic where we have the best 5 or 6 six solvency cards that say why it really needs to be overruled
Another swipe has been taken at the ability of the affirmative to generally defend the need to overrule in
Another swipe has been taken at the ability of the affirmative to generally defend the need to overrule in
posted by Stefan at 6/02/2006 09:47:00 AM
¶ 
Comments:
<< Home
Jim Lyle said,
"has there been a Boerne v. Lemon debate. I've looked pretty hard and found nothing that says overrule/overturn Boerne. The closest is the one card Steve has that says the decision was decided wrongly. We have evidence for Lemon - solvency evidence. If the goal is to give the AFF some good choices, I don't see how harms evidence alone is a good choice. Furthermore, Lemon has pretty good harm areas as well, and is probably as protected against the agent cp.
People will approve Boerne because they want a religious freedom aff, and find out there isn't much there (especially when compared to Lemon). Yes, there are other harms areas (SOP/civil rights), but these are still rights impacts. And, this doesn't deal with the lack of a solvency advocate. I'd be curious to hear what people have to say about Boerne. I'd guess most know nothing and are taking Steve's word on this case."
Post a Comment
"has there been a Boerne v. Lemon debate. I've looked pretty hard and found nothing that says overrule/overturn Boerne. The closest is the one card Steve has that says the decision was decided wrongly. We have evidence for Lemon - solvency evidence. If the goal is to give the AFF some good choices, I don't see how harms evidence alone is a good choice. Furthermore, Lemon has pretty good harm areas as well, and is probably as protected against the agent cp.
People will approve Boerne because they want a religious freedom aff, and find out there isn't much there (especially when compared to Lemon). Yes, there are other harms areas (SOP/civil rights), but these are still rights impacts. And, this doesn't deal with the lack of a solvency advocate. I'd be curious to hear what people have to say about Boerne. I'd guess most know nothing and are taking Steve's word on this case."
<< Home
